Structural Integrity
Provides the proportion of low human footprint areas that form continuous habitat clusters. The percentages indicate landscape connectivity, allowing species to move freely and maintain ecological integrity across the region.
availability
On Demand
Now
indicator tier
Gold
unit
%
spatial resolution
300m
measurement frequency
Annual
measurement level
Plot
historic data availability
2024
Forescast data availability
N/A
applicable crop types
All
applicable land type
Cropland
Grassland
Annual Cropland
Perennial Cropland
Forestry
Urban
Coastal Marine
Conservation
compliance frameworks
TNFD, Nature Positive Initiative (NPI), CSRD (ESRS E4), SBTN
description
Structural Integrity refers to the physical intactness of an ecosystem. This includes the size, shape, and connectivity of natural habitats. A landscape with high structural integrity is caracterized by large, connected areas of natural vegetation, free from significant human modification. When ecosystems become fragmented by roads, agriculture, or urban development, their structural integrity is compromised. This can isolate populations of species, disrupt ecological flows, and make the ecosystem more vulnerable to external pressures.
methodology
The methodology assesses landscape structural integrity as the percentage of core habitats, that is contiguous habitats of a minimum patch size.
We apply a quality-weighted core habitat quantification that accounts for both habitat quality and spatial configuration. It is based on the Global Human Modification (GHM) dataset, which quantifies human pressures such as urbanization, agriculture, infrastructure, and extractive activities on a scale from 0 (unmodified) to 1 (fully modified). Areas with HMI values below 0.4 are classified as habitat, and a 300 m erosion process is applied to identify core habitat by removing edge-affected areas. This distinguishes large, intact habitat patches from fragmented landscapes, even when total habitat area is the same.
Core habitat pixels are then weighted according to quality, with more natural areas receiving higher scores and modified areas excluded. These weighted values are averaged within a 5 km radius and normalized to produce a structural integrity score ranging from 0 to 1, where higher values indicate larger amounts of high-quality core habitat.
The selected parameters are supported by ecological research and reflect species’ landscape-scale responses, habitat modification thresholds, and the typical extent of edge effects.
validation
model limitations
Get started
Begin your journey today.
